From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 20 17:24:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47731106566C for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from resmaa13.ono.com (smtp13.ono.com [62.42.230.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD678FC08 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from GogPortatil.retena.com (188.76.0.243) by resmaa13.ono.com (8.5.113) (authenticated as nec556@retena.com) id 4D6348DC01B1E406; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:12:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4D6348DC01B1E406@> (added by postmaster@resmaa13.ono.com) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:12:27 +0200 To: "Michael W. Lucas" ,questions@freebsd.org From: Eduardo Morras In-Reply-To: <20110720160432.GA41775@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <20110720160432.GA41775@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 10.0.1390 [1518/3776] Cc: Subject: Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:24:04 -0000 At 18:04 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote: >Hi, > >I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel. When using FTP >or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit >network, no errors showing. > >It looks a lot like kern/152828, but it seems that nobody's looking at >that. Don't know about that, but perhaps the nic is not working at full gigabit. Can you post the output of ifconfig? #ifconfig em0 If it's not connected at 1 gigabit or not full duplex you can force it with ifconfig. If there are too much errors check the cable. >As per suggestions from the archives, I've tried disabling TSO. No >change. > >Anyone else experiencing this, or have any suggestions? At the moment, >the boss is complaining that his Windows Home Server is doing better >than this machine, and that's a technological direction I really don't >want to go in. > >Thanks, >==ml