From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 24 20:06:02 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8536316A41C
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:06:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from relay.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.1.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1010F43D4C
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:06:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 84388 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2005 20:06:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown)
	by unknown with SMTP; 24 Jun 2005 20:06:00 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:05:44 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <20050624092723.GA4393@nagual.pp.ru>
Message-ID: <20050624150442.F83036@odysseus.silby.com>
References: <20050624032731.T82841@odysseus.silby.com>
	<20050624092723.GA4393@nagual.pp.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: panic: Memory modified after free
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:06:02 -0000


On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Andrey Chernov wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 03:29:42AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>>
>> Andrey, the use after free panic you reported sounds like it could be a
>> use after free of a mbuf.  What network interfaces do you have on your
>> system, and what features are you using?  (ipfw, netgraph, etc.)
>
> No ipfw, netgraph or anything complex.
>
> de0: flags=108843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>        inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>        ether 00:00:c0:f1:ef:d3
>        media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP
>        status: active

Ok, I'm going to spend a few minutes doing an inspection of if_de.c to see 
if I can find anything odd.

Can anyone else with a de card confirm that whether their system now 
elicits similar panics or whether it's all good?

Mike "Silby" Silbersack