From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 01:59:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3BB16A418 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.alaskaparadise.com (freebsd.alaskaparadise.com [208.79.80.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468D413C457 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from 137-42-178-69.gci.net (137-42-178-69.gci.net [69.178.42.137]) by freebsd.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3BD23835A5; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:59:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Beech Rintoul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <476086E2.5030402@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <476086E2.5030402@gmail.com> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:59:04 -0900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200712121659.08699.beech@freebsd.org> Cc: Sten Daniel Soersdal Subject: Re: (postfix) SPAM filter? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Beech Rintoul List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:59:12 -0000 On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Sten Daniel Soersdal said: > We have a need for a relatively painless anti-spam solution that > would reduce the amount of incoming spam (via postfix mail router). > The problem is that i have little knowledge on what this actually > means. Googling reveals a whole "universe" of interesting ways but > what should i pursue? > The things that are important to me is: > > * Once it is setup then it would require no additional maintenance. > * Potential spam messages are marked with a special header that can > be filtered on user discretion on their local mail client software. I should also mention that SpamAssassin has exactly such an option and doesn't require any hands on except for an occasional update once set up. > > Neither performance, scalability, license nor cost is of much > importance to me at this point. > > Any hints? Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------