From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 24 20:25:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903F016A41C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:25:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pho@holm.cc) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AA9343D4C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:25:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pho@holm.cc) Received: (qmail 92823 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2005 20:25:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO peter.osted.lan) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 24 Jun 2005 20:25:07 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 80.161.118.233 Received: from peter.osted.lan (localhost.osted.lan [127.0.0.1]) by peter.osted.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5OKP6l9017304; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:25:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pho@peter.osted.lan) Received: (from pho@localhost) by peter.osted.lan (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5OKP6oW017303; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:25:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pho) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:25:05 +0200 From: Peter Holm To: Mike Silbersack Message-ID: <20050624202505.GA17245@peter.osted.lan> References: <20050624145923.P83036@odysseus.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050624145923.P83036@odysseus.silby.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: current@freebsd.org, Thierry Herbelot Subject: Re: new panics X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:25:08 -0000 On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 03:01:34PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > The Memory modified after free panics you guys have reported are > unfortunately not pinpointing where the error occured, they're just > pinpointing where the error was detected. :) > > So, either I need to improve the code to be more useful, or we could do > some quick code inspection - which network devices are you using, and are > you using any features like ipfw, netgraph, etc? > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack I'm stress testing with GENERIC + $ diff GENERIC PHO 68a69 > options BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER 295a297,303 > > options DEBUG_LOCKS > options DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS > options KTR > options KTR_ENTRIES=4096 > options KTR_MASK=(KTR_BUF|KTR_VFS) > options KTR_COMPILE=(KTR_BUF|KTR_VFS) rl0: port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem 0xff9ffc00-0xff9ffcff irq 22 at device 5.0 on pci2 I get the panics within minutes of testing, so if there's any thing I can do to help ... -- Peter Holm