From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 28 23:06:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5538FF5E for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ataraxi@telia.com) Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (smtp-out12.han.skanova.net [195.67.226.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA052F4C for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alice.nodomain.nowhere (95.199.151.241) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u51204108) id 51B4DDE700941905; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:05:06 +0200 Received: by alice.nodomain.nowhere (Postfix, from userid 1002) id CE7E51F4A75; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:04:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alice.nodomain.nowhere (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3C61F4858; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:04:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:04:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Conny Andersson To: Teske Devin Subject: Re: FreeBSD slices and the Boot Manager In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FF6013@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Message-ID: References: <20130729013637.M32053@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FF6013@ltcfiswmsgmb21> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Ian Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:06:43 -0000 Hi Devin, Apropos sade (sysadmins disk editor). I have it at /usr/sbin/sade and I am running a FreeBSD 8.3. I also mounted FreeBSD 8.1 and FreeBSD 8.2 and found sade at /usr/sbin/ even in these older FreeBSDs. Regards, Conny > On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Teske, Devin wrote: > > In this case, sade is (or was) a direct by-product of the death of > sysinstall(8). It only exists in 9 or higher. > > In-fact... sade was (up until recently in HEAD) actual code removed from > sysinstall(8). > > NOTE: In HEAD, sade(8) is now a direct path to "bsdinstall partedit" > > I don't know what the long-term goals are for sade, but it's a nice > 4-letter acronym that's a nice keystroke saver (at the very least). > -- > Devin >> On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Ian Smith wrote: >> --- --- --- >> Right. sysinstall(8) - or at least the fdisk and bsdlabel modules that >> constitute sade(8) - remains the only safe and sane way to handle MBR >> disks.