From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 07:13:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED1D16A41C; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:13:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanco@satro.sk) Received: from mail.satronet.sk (mail.satronet.sk [217.144.16.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4175B43D58; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:13:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanco@satro.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.satronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ADA1605A151; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:13:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.satronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31436-02-21; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:13:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.175.51.163] (unknown [147.175.51.163]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.satronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF091605665F; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:13:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Michal Vanco Organization: Satro s.r.o. To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:13:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> <42B5CD89.6070509@wm-access.no> In-Reply-To: <42B5CD89.6070509@wm-access.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506201113.34307.vanco@satro.sk> X-Virus-Scanned: by ANTIvirus at satronet.sk Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Sten Daniel =?iso-8859-1?q?S=F8rsdal?= Subject: Re: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:13:41 -0000 --nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 19 June 2005 21:54, Sten Daniel S=F8rsdal wrote: > Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it > > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is. > > > > What is opinion of other networkers? > > How about also adding a sysctl for setting a delay time between event > and disabling of the route? Then even people with roaming wlan cards can > benefit. > Also it is in my opinion that the route be disabled (moved to a passive > route table maybe?) and not deleted. This is what I meant initially. Marking route passive is better than just=20 deleting it and it'll be also faster to recall the route back in case of li= nk=20 up. --nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCtoi+2/VqJwUsLAMRAkV7AJ9k4+qUBriivsLdaNcjSo3RHtA3LQCgmgEG hm+IhTO2UeeDrVeR6401neE= =s+kG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3864263.Jzx53G1yHf--