From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 12:58:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A9716A4BF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B0C43F3F; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:58:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D165482B; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:58:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3CF1E6D461; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:58:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:58:48 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20030819195848.GA32622@madman.celabo.org> References: <200308170840.h7H8endW060225@repoman.freebsd.org> <1061285875.8010.63.camel@localhost> <20030819.092307.61268786.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030819.092307.61268786.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: paul@freebsd-services.com cc: gordon@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/devd Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:58:51 -0000 On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:23:07AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > There were two issues with making devd static: 1) it is a lot smaller > than haging libstd++ (which isn't the case for all the other > libraries) and 2) there were issues with crunchgen and c++ programs. > Making it static just cleans things up a bit. but wait, i'm about to commit new, rewritten ls(1), echo(1), rm(1) and a few others. they are all in C++ (C is obsolete). probably it now makes sense to move libstdc++.so.4 to /lib? -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se j/k