From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Jul 3 06:25:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-hardware Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA07047 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 06:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uu.elvisti.kiev.ua (acc0.elvisti.kiev.ua [193.125.28.132]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA06825; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 06:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from office.elvisti.kiev.ua (office.elvisti.kiev.ua [193.125.28.129]) by uu.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA00462; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:41:22 +0300 (EET DST) Received: (from stesin@localhost) by office.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.6.12/8.ElVisti) id QAA03393; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:41:21 +0300 From: "Andrew V. Stesin" Message-Id: <199607031341.QAA03393@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> Subject: Re: muliport boards - building a PPP dialup server To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:41:21 +0300 (EET DST) Cc: stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua, michaelv@HeadCandy.com, cofer@www.cas.unt.edu, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, Kevin_Swanson@blacksmith.com, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199607031243.WAA09601@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Jul 3, 96 10:13:12 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha5] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi Mike, # > and who can enlighten me about Stallion cards? # # gerg@stallion.com.au wrote and supports the FreeBSD driver for the # entire range of Stallion cards. Thanks for the pointer! (I tried mailto:info@stallion.com recently, and didn't get any useful information, signal/noise was ~0.0 in their reply). # > (I'm looking for PCI, 16 or 32 ports device, be it # > Stallion, Cyclades, Digiboard or whoever). # > At least 16 ports, PCI, and FreeBSD support _are_ the # > requirements. # # I'm curious - why PCI? Something makes me beleive that if I want more than 16 ports at 115200 per box, there would be two bottlenecks: 1. tty-level driver overhead, that's what I'm watching now with 16 FIFOed ports in 486dx4/100 -- interrupt load is tiny, and most of CPU is eaten by system. "Smart" card with it's own CPU (I treat it like an I/O co-processor) should minimize this factor. (?) 2. ISA bus itself, no matter what will I put into it. We don't have any EISA slots; so PCI is left. (And should I mention the fact that there are boxes around of non-Intel architectures running unices, which have PCI slots but no ISA slots?) Yes, probably I'm wrong and ISA can deal i.e. with 32x115200; but how reliable will this configuration be? # Stallion have an excellent reputation and their gear # is available prettymuch anywhere in the worl; Still absent here in Ukraine, for a pity. # I wouldn't hesitate to # recommend them if you're serious about your hardware. Thanks, got it. -- With best regards -- Andrew Stesin. Phones/fax: +380 (44) { 244-0122, 276-0188, 271-3457, 271-3560 } "You may delegate authority, but not responsibility." Frank's Management Rule #1.