From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 31 13:37:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BCC16A4DD for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arch@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CA943D4C for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-arch@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GImj9-0000je-61 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:37:04 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:37:03 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:37:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:34:43 +0200 Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <20060831121426.GA27060@stud.ntnu.no> <20060831131140.GA2955@stud.ntnu.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050921) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20060831131140.GA2955@stud.ntnu.no> Sender: news Subject: Re: Improvements to gvinum and it's future X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:37:16 -0000 Ulf Lilleengen wrote: > what I had in mind. Hiding these details are important, but the question was > really what the "foundation" for this would be, and gvirstor and similar classes > seems to be good for that. I apologize for the confusion. No problem, I though you wanted to replicate existing GEOM classes in one big kernel module :)