From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Dec 20 10:52: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (alecto.physics.uiuc.edu [130.126.8.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D205615120 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 10:52:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu) Received: (from igor@localhost) by alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) id MAA00734 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 12:52:00 -0600 (CST) From: Igor Roshchin Message-Id: <199912201852.MAA00734@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu> Subject: xl0 question To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 12:51:59 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! After installation of 3.3-STABLE (snapshot of 19991216) on a few computers I noticed messages about tx underrun in xl0: xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> rev 0x24 int a irq 11 on pci0.11.0 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:10:5a:a9:fa:91 xl0: autoneg complete, link status good (full-duplex, 100Mbps) xl0: transmission error: 90 xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 120 bytes xl0: transmission error: 90 xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 180 bytes This is noticed on computers with PPRO (180) and Pentium (150) cpus. I haven't seen such messages on either 3.1-STABLE or 2.x on the same computers. Is there anything to worry about ? Thanks, Igor PS. please respond to my address, I am not subscribed to the list at the moment. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message