From owner-freebsd-hardware  Thu Apr 10 08:24:23 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA12108
          for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 08:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from persprog.com (persprog.com [204.215.255.203])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA12100
          for <hardware@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 08:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received:  by persprog.com (8.7.5/4.10)
	id KAA22891; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 10:10:28 -0500
Received: from dave(192.2.2.6) by cerberus.ppi.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma022872; Thu Apr 10 11:10:27 1997
Message-ID: <334D02E2.9EFF69F6@persprog.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 11:10:26 -0400
From: Dave Alderman <dave@persprog.com>
Reply-To: dave@persprog.com
Organization: Personalized Programming, Inc
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b3 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>
CC: hardware@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ?
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970410154542.23602N-100000@bagpuss.visint.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Stephen Roome wrote:
 
> I'm not too sure but the TX is apprently more of a VX with some of the
> niceties of the HX. So HX still might be better, or whatever comes after
> the HX as it's upgrade.
> 

There will be no successor to the HX.  Intel wants you to buy a Pro (or
now II) instead.
-- 
David W. Alderman	dave@persprog.com