From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 4 21:58:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dt054n86.san.rr.com (dt054n86.san.rr.com [24.30.152.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AAD14ED5; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 21:58:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt054n86.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA18446; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 21:58:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <37803B6C.4FA53C23@gorean.org> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 21:58:20 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: obrien@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: proposal to add ICQ/AIM ports to "irc" category References: <19990704123045.A96672@dragon.nuxi.com> <199907050319.UAA99704@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > > * From: "David O'Brien" > * > * I propose that we make the "irc" category the "irc-icq-aim" category and > * move the following ports there from "net": > * > * gaim gicq gnomeicu icb icqlib ja-gicq ja-gtkicq ja-libicq ja-micq kicq > * libicq licq micq naim tik xicq > > We can make a separate "icq" category. I don't see why we'd want to > combine it with "irc", they are different protocols and are not > compatible (as far as I know). Yes they are different, no they are not compatible. I would rather see a "chat" category rather than splitting them all into seperate little directories. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message