From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Nov 18 10:46:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510D4A32A8F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE43F1B35; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so191314597wmw.1; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 02:46:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wwESeFhlwlvSagmlYAmKFix9Y26hjypf9E1IU7XVPc4=; b=DU0BLYMz4qCWwKV7b0AgOUuwCZXBNnMxdzPf9HgbosG1rgq0k9AtuLMKAuJiCgg4Fe hkObSUIY8YefhdMiFEwYLq/k+5Fpjps0olpFir5Uos5smVdBqtNBdy5Ux5mVHVtQrv2Q q1Vf/Bnt8ireH9r4hKP4PJE9WqNiJm/apSzx2y7IdI8pGRqW1I5rZ77Q1Jcuz4fO1+++ 89ceUBV6SlpoSPO7qqnkZb7Uc0MvacqPUxC5yx2u6ZxkoXJISYjW5XxgVybShOJFN3E2 ey/Rozv38mXSsGXcrsVkS/3ZNTNorA3NNCkG+2zQcrLN5yHZKS3p1lLA3vE0ZxWsog/Q r/lA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.243.227 with SMTP id xb3mr1196771wjc.96.1447843562437; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 02:46:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.186.138 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 02:46:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <564C4F8E.40007@FreeBSD.org> References: <564C4F8E.40007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:46:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg-fallout mails From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Matthew Seaman Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:46:04 -0000 On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Seaman wrot= e: > On 2015/11/18 07:04, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: >> !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100090, Host: 1100085) !!! >> !!! This is not supported. !!! >> !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! >> !!! Expect build failures. !!! >> >> >> Can anyone please say if this is expected? Is anyone running >> tests/changing things in the ports building infrastructure? I could >> just ignore the mails, but I never received so many of these before. > > This warning appears on pretty much all pkg-fallout e-mails for HEAD. > It is a red-herring, and has nothing at all to do with why the e-mail is > being sent. It's just a warning: the host and jail versions are > sufficiently close there is no actual conflict between the system kernel > and the jail's userland even though that userland is more recent. Thanks for the explanation! > > The problem that is causing builds to fail in the pkg cluster will > appear towards the *end* of the build log included in the e-mail. If > you're getting these e-mails then the affected port is failing to build > on at least one of the supported environments where it is expected to > work. As port maintainer, you are meant to look into those build > failures and preferably fix them; not just ignore the e-mails. If you > don't understand why this port is failing to build, then there are any > number of people here who will be happy to assist. I was just trying to understand why that port that hasn't been updated in a while was suddenly failing to build... and well... the "Expect build failures" was kind of an explanation :) I'll have a look at it as soon as I can. Cheers. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > >