From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 26 8:44:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailhub.fokus.gmd.de (mailhub.fokus.gmd.de [193.174.154.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFB737B719; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:44:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krepel@fokus.gmd.de) Received: from fokus.gmd.de (quant [193.175.133.183]) by mailhub.fokus.gmd.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA03305; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 18:44:36 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3ABF71F4.593D6C48@fokus.gmd.de> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 18:44:36 +0200 From: Falco Krepel Organization: GMD FOKUS - CATS Group X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en, de-DE MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Smith Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: use md device in /etc/rc.diskless{1,2} References: <200103260708.f2Q78D601140@mass.dis.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a fine solution. I hope it's OK when I add this to my patch request. But I have two remarks. 1. For example you could use the diskless boot procedure for smart clients with a small disk used as swap space. So I think it is better to use swap instead of malloc for var,dev, and tmp. This could be done with a variable (e.g. diskless_swap_enable). What do think about it? 2. Building a dev dir is obsolete when you use DEVFS. So you should distinguish between these two situations. I don't know if you could use one of the "vfs.devfs.*" variables to determine the usage of DEVFS. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message