From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 19:03:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479D9C1F; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from agogare.doit.wisc.edu (agogare.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B918ED8D; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:03:02 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Received: from avs-daemon.smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) id <0MIO00F00PPV4F00@smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:02:55 -0600 (CST) X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-2, Version=5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2013.2.23.175120, SenderIP=0.0.0.0 X-Spam-Report: AuthenticatedSender=yes, SenderIP=0.0.0.0 Received: from wanderer.tachypleus.net (adsl-76-208-68-53.dsl.mdsnwi.sbcglobal.net [76.208.68.53]) by smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0MIO00EJ0Q4STK00@smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:02:53 -0600 (CST) X-Wisc-Sender: whitehorn@wisc.edu Message-id: <5129044B.20901@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:02:51 -0600 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130217 Thunderbird/17.0.2 To: Hiroki Sato Subject: Re: New version of TeX? References: <5111C78D.1080901@bsdforen.de> <51125F9D.3080705@freebsd.org> <20130217.054128.2085726423999653661.hrs@allbsd.org> In-reply-to: <20130217.054128.2085726423999653661.hrs@allbsd.org> Cc: crees@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:03:03 -0000 On 02/16/13 14:41, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Chris Rees wrote > in : > > cr> On 6 February 2013 13:50, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > cr> > On 02/05/13 21:01, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > cr> >> On 04/02/2013 21:08, Boris Samorodov wrote: > cr> >>> 04.02.2013 10:21, Dominic Fandrey пишет: > cr> >>>> On 04/02/2013 02:04, Danilo Egea wrote: > cr> >>>>> Well, there is this project http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/ > cr> >>>> > cr> >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/171571 > cr> >>> > cr> >>> I use the patch from this PR together with the attached diff > cr> >>> and portmaster seems to DTRT with dependencies. > cr> >> > cr> >> Seeing that someone else actually uses it, I just attached a little > cr> >> update fixing a problem I discovered only a couple of days ago. I > cr> >> recommend you to install texlive-base again. > cr> >> > cr> >> Also I think it would be nice if you attached your patches to the PR. > cr> >> > cr> >> Regards > cr> >> > cr> > > cr> > Is there any chance this could be committed now pending a longer-term > cr> > rearchitecture of the TeX stuff? I just installed it on three machines > cr> > (thanks!) with no trouble at all and everything is working perfectly. > cr> > Waiting for some long-term solution seems to be making the perfect the > cr> > enemy of the good -- and this Friday will mark 8 years since the last > cr> > teTeX update. > cr> > cr> I would very much like to put Dominic's version in (for no particular > cr> reason other than simplicity, and it was the first I looked at-- I > cr> can't see any major advantage of one over the other). > cr> > cr> Hiroki-san, can we please move this forward? I'm happy to test and > cr> commit this one. If the worst comes to the worst, we could have > cr> alternative TeXLive ports accompanied by a USE_LATEX knob and > cr> bsd.latex.mk.... > > I will start to commit a bunch of ports based on > texlive-20120701-source in this week. At first they are several big > ports (much like Dominic's one), then will be split into smaller ones > to support the existing TeX-related packages, and print/teTeX* will > be removed eventually. > > -- Hiroki > Any news here? -Nathan