From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 15:13:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3EF34E for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potato.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9969622CD for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john by potato.growveg.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1WzotM-000Jpe-7a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:13:44 +0100 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:13:44 +0100 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: versions move backwards with freebsd-update(8) Message-ID: <20140625151344.GA76100@potato.growveg.org> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20140625143934.GA73214@potato.growveg.org> <53AAE3AD.5000701@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53AAE3AD.5000701@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: John X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@potato.growveg.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on potato.growveg.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:13:46 -0000 On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 04:58:53PM +0200, Rolf Nielsen wrote: > > If there are no updates to the kernel, the version info will not be > updated even if userland has been updated. If you previously updated > by compiling source, the version info would have been updated, in your > case to p5. However, if there have been no changes to the GENERIC > kernel since p4, the reported version will revert to that after a > binary update. Hi, The reason I expected p6 was because freebsd-update said this: The following files will be updated as part of updating to 10.0-RELEASE-p6: /bin/freebsd-version /boot/kernel/kernel [...] so why does it say it's going to upgrade to p6 and the resulting upgrade is p4? Why didn't it say p4? (remember it was at p5 to begin with. I usually use svn to upgrade) thanks, -- John