From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 07:30:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5A116BEEE; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 07:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76ED943D66; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 07:30:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-125-192.51-151.net24.it [151.51.192.125]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k517ZjHH024615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 09:35:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k517TkYI086268; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 09:29:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <447E9764.1030107@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:29:40 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org References: <44slmrr2t2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44slmrr2t2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: Openoffice compilation failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:30:35 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Looks kind of like a problem that was fixed within the last few > days when the port was updated to the next release candidate. > Try updating your ports? Looks kinda not. I've got 2.0.3rc3 and I have the same problem. I reported it several months ago and all I got to be told was that it's a strange problem. bye av.