From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 21 20:48:27 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8C85629
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:48:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com
 [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C11D150D
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:48:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852E13AE6E
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: De Raadt + FBSD + OpenSSH + hole?
In-Reply-To: <53546795.9050304@quietfountain.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:39:17 -0700
Message-ID: <97711.1398112757@server1.tristatelogic.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:48:27 -0000


In message <53546795.9050304@quietfountain.com>, 
"hcoin" <hcoin@quietfountain.com> wrote:

>... It is for the community to decide whether it is 'worth it' 
>on a case by case basis given there is no way to prove a program 
>'correct' from a security perspective.

I guess that I was sick that day in software school.

Did I just hear you tell me that I can't prove the following program
is "secure"?


int
main (void)
{
  return 0;
}