From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 2 21:22:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: perl@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A91FFC5 for ; Sat, 2 May 2015 21:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D55241782 for ; Sat, 2 May 2015 21:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7EBBDC25; Sat, 2 May 2015 23:22:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E3DBABDC24; Sat, 2 May 2015 23:22:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D6531C27F4; Sat, 2 May 2015 23:22:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 23:22:36 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Adam Weinberger , perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unmaintained perl ports Message-ID: <0C12C7BEDEE81EACF88E7E9D@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 21:22:42 -0000 +--On 2 mai 2015 09:21:54 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote: | Hi everyone, | | What's our perspective on perl ports maintained by perl@? For the most | part, those ports don't get updated or improved very often. I tend only | to scan portscout for perl@ ports. | | I was thinking about assigning those modules to perl@. What do you think | of that idea? I wanted to do that for some time now, I just had not gotten around to it :-) -- Mathieu Arnold