From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan  2 14:55:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA10023
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 14:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA10018
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 14:55:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by mail.cdsnet.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA12780
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 14:55:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 14:55:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Jaye Mathisen  <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Any good reason to run portmap on a non NFS'd/RPC'd machine?
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970102144854.14712M-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



I'm not using YP or any of that stuff.  If not, then it seems like
something that would be good to turn into a sysconfig variable.