From owner-freebsd-arch  Tue Mar  5 14:45:26 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from outboundx.mv.meer.net (outboundx.mv.meer.net [209.157.152.12])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B9B37B405
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  5 Mar 2002 14:45:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14])
	by outboundx.mv.meer.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g25MjIs37463;
	Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:45:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com)
Received: from neville-neil.com ([209.157.133.226])
	by mail.meer.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/meer) with ESMTP id g25MjHcI053673;
	Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200203052245.g25MjHcI053673@mail.meer.net>
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: do we need full kernel sources to compile loadable modules ? 
In-Reply-To: Message from Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> 
   of "Tue, 05 Mar 2002 13:49:32 PST." <20020305134932.A79697@iguana.icir.org> 
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 14:45:17 -0800
From: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>  + is it a desirable goal that one can compile kernel extensions without
>    requiring a full kernel source tree ?

That sounds like a good goal.  If it's just one file then isn't that
just a mistake to be fixed?

Later,
George

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message