From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 21 09:27:02 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E2B472F;
 Wed, 21 May 2014 09:27:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE80F2389;
 Wed, 21 May 2014 09:27:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AprilRyan.norad (iz-aix-213a.HS-Karlsruhe.DE [193.196.64.213])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E313F7E8CB;
 Wed, 21 May 2014 11:26:57 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <537C7161.20205@bsdforen.de>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 11:26:57 +0200
From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>, 
 Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Staging issue with staging of net-im/libpurple (libtool?)
References: <CAN6yY1to8mZ9aw_cikEDJH42EVLMuBbEVZZ19SpOcGUQjDTZkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140520085544.GB69382@pcjas.obspm.fr>
 <20140520140945.1383e5e2@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <20140520121449.GA70272@pcjas.obspm.fr>
 <20140520145559.4aed52a5@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <20140520143904.GA70855@pcjas.obspm.fr>
 <CAN6yY1vm3O7evs_1zVO-LcERia5Vh7VgYPdU6FFp8J=LoqQg3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140520221340.17ba4c56@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140520221340.17ba4c56@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:27:02 -0000

On 20/05/2014 22:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 08:52:46 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> Removed the FIND and re-built. After the build I looked in
>> stage/usr/local/lib and the .so.0 files are still present! I then installed
>> with no errors. I'll admit that I don't understand what is happening or why
>> the touch of the files would break things, but it seems to be fixed, now.
> 
> The touch didn't always give all files the same timestamp so sometimes
> make thought the configure script was out of date and regenerated it
> erasing any patches that had been applied to it.

I figure something like:
find FOO -exec touch {} +

would do the trick.

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?