From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 18 04:36:45 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD4737B432
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eborcom.com (dsl-62-3-122-102.zen.co.uk [62.3.122.102])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E572B44035
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 03:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tom@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 14503 invoked by uid 1001); 18 Aug 2003 10:41:24 -0000
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:41:24 +0100
From: Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.org>
To: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>,
	freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030818104124.GA14467@eborcom.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.org>,
	Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>,
	freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <m3bruomaxq.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
	<20030818092850.GD718@galgenberg.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030818092850.GD718@galgenberg.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: Port WITH_* options and updates/portupgrade
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:36:48 -0000

On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 11:28:50AM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> 
> I think the whole dependancy thing should be thought over. E.g. I have
> to specify WITH_APACHE2 to every port, because that's what I got
> installed and apache1 still is the default.

In this case, you could add the line:
WITH_APACHE2=	yes
to /etc/make.conf, but I agree this thread has raised some interesting
points.

Tom