From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 22 19:58:39 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: doc@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2778E16A480
	for <doc@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:58:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F79613C4C1
	for <doc@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:58:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 23901 invoked by uid 399); 22 Jan 2007 19:58:38 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1)
	by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jan 2007 19:58:38 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1
Message-ID: <45B51769.60902@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:58:33 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
References: <200701171832.28368.dienst@marcrenearns.de>	<474078f80701181348q16ceb16bs40ba45b3d7057b83@mail.gmail.com>	<20070121212428.GA47379@rambler-co.ru>	<200701221111.56264.jhb@freebsd.org>	<1169489832.11889.64.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu>	<45B506A7.7060909@FreeBSD.org>
	<1169492498.11889.74.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1169492498.11889.74.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: re@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org,
	Murray Stokely <murray.stokely@gmail.com>,
	Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, doc@FreeBSD.org,
	Marc Ren? Arns <dienst@marcrenearns.de>
Subject: Re: make buildkernel fails without complete source tree
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:58:39 -0000

Ken Smith wrote:
> IMHO we should
> either leave it as-is for the traditionalists or we should bite the
> bullet and stop providing a separate kernel source tree.  As John
> pointed out in the message after this one life has moved on and
> now /usr/src is teeny compared to the size of disks.  Is it worth the
> hassle/confusion to provide just kernel source any more?

I personally don't think so, but I didn't want to suggest anything so
revolutionary. :)

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection