From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 8 14:59:10 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA23746 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 8 May 1995 14:59:10 -0700 Received: from pluto.ops.NeoSoft.com (root@pluto.ops.NeoSoft.COM [198.64.212.23]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA23740 for ; Mon, 8 May 1995 14:59:08 -0700 Received: from metal.ops.neosoft.com (root@glenn-slip42.nmt.edu [129.138.5.142]) by pluto.ops.NeoSoft.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id QAA25526; Mon, 8 May 1995 16:59:01 -0500 Received: (from smace@localhost) by metal.ops.neosoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.10) id PAA00426; Mon, 8 May 1995 15:58:57 -0600 From: Scott Mace Message-Id: <199505082158.PAA00426@metal.ops.neosoft.com> Subject: Re: Is a 486 fast enough for SCSI? To: tom@haven.uniserve.com (Tom Samplonius) Date: Mon, 8 May 1995 15:58:57 -0600 (MDT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Tom Samplonius" at May 8, 95 12:26:33 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 582 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > I've got a AMD486DX4100 with an Adaptec 2940 and two SCSI drives. When > I run iozone on one drive I get about 1.9MB/s, but when I run a iozone on > each drive I get about .9 MB/s (roughly half). Since the SCSI bus runs > at 10MB/s per second, the limiting factor appears to be the CPU? I > thought PCI devices required very little CPU time? > The limiting time is the speed of the drive. I can get over 3megs/sec with my EISA bt747 and seagate barracuda drives. And my cpu is only a 486DX2-66. I'm never seen a single scsi drive actually do 10MB/sec. Scott