From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 4 17:13:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115091065676 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apseudoutopia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com (mail-ew0-f216.google.com [209.85.219.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BB28FC1D for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so3039023ewy.35 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:13:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=t1QnsoHp3HnzTRxvtJyWmQC/RbnwTElyTe0I9ZehptA=; b=ioZl3zNhDwcWFflODQ7Lw8HiJZbTMG7Ov4lMePZVAiYw5gW+8lDSb0s41OniSuQAvC nMymw6VbL2Ha7dIu8nNC3mNYIMvJP4CYWueXhEVwqgJU1teXuYiWx+FJtXx7bVluRu3C ikTs1++DiUiiaGf5NUkH0EvyFe2LR9zMhGR/Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Z3HJVe/JOiD627FyJXLfGE5aSrPMJZ1LUERvynDgxzCnsTq7v5WORPMNcGq3QRDJde Ox58Z3zZ9IKIlOT+2EJfvQT+EXCfqPbatkd4Pu6UNiBZFA9KRKS8EvE6q+2JkWeX3NJg s5p0GXB2nJbfF1UVPoeJLQUxcXfaRYswQoiVw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.138 with SMTP id u10mr1149112wee.185.1259946781398; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:13:01 -0800 (PST) From: APseudoUtopia Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:12:41 -0500 Message-ID: <27ade5280912040912i53f9871cj9502afc941073bef@mail.gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: SMP and ALTQ_NOPCC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:13:03 -0000 Hello, With the improvements in SMP in FreeBSD 8.0, is the ALTQ_NOPCC option still required? In the handbook and other older documentation, it says ALTQ_NOPCC is in fact required on SMP systems because the TSC is unstable. I was wondering if this is still the case after the improvements done with SMP. Thanks.