From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 29 10:26:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6F937B401 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.24cl.com (174.113.sn.ct.dsl.thebiz.net [216.238.113.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D8D43E3B for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from myraq@mgm51.com) Received: from winbloat (winbloat.24cl.home [10.0.1.10]) by home.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312632B28A for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:26:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <200209291326140275.00B1A01B@home.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <20020929040441.8105683@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> References: <20020929040441.8105683@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.20.01.01 (4) Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:26:14 -0400 Reply-To: myraq@mgm51.com From: "MikeM" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Possible trojan since upgrade Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 9/28/2002 at 9:04 PM Andy Sparrow wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, MikeM wrote: >> >> > Do you mean the MX with the higher number, rather than lower number? >> > For my domain, my backup MX is priority 100, my main MX is priority 0. >> > Or do I have these critters set up backwards? > >Nope, you're good. > >BTW, I seem to recall that the Cricket Liu DNS book (might be the >Sendmail "Bat" book though) still advises not using an MX value of 0 for >the primary, due to some (unspecified, IIRC), broken MTAs. > >Never seen it cause a problem myself though... ... ============= So far, the 0 hasn't been a problem for me. But I'll bump it up a notch or two the next time I'm in the DNS config. Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message