From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Dec 17 00:08:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA21317
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:08:28 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca34-53.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.181])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA21310
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:08:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id AAA10026; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199712170807.AAA10026@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: cracauer@cons.org
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <19971217090229.60856@cons.org> (message from Martin Cracauer on Wed, 17 Dec 1997 09:02:29 +0100)
Subject: Re: ilu port -O
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

A port that can't be compiled with optimization is obviously "work in
progress", that's why. :)

By the way, have you even seen an assembly language output of a
program compiled without optimization?

Satoshi