From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 10 07:56:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA10931 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 07:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ulantris.infinop.com (root@ulantris.infinop.com [205.230.144.80]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA10906; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 07:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from john@localhost) by ulantris.infinop.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) id JAA20671; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 09:58:52 -0500 (CDT) From: "John A. Booth" Message-Id: <199606101458.JAA20671@ulantris.infinop.com> Subject: Re: mail overload. To: DARREND@novell.com (Darren Davis) Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 09:58:51 -0500 (CDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Darren Davis" at Jun 10, 96 08:40:12 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > What are the thoughts on breaking this stuff out of mail lists and into > news groups? (At least there I can use kill files to eliminate the noise.) There are news groups or is a newsgroup. My personal feeling is news takes too long to propagate. I get much better response to the mailing lists--I'm more apt to read a mailing list than a news group. If I don't think the subject applies I delete the messages w/o reading it.