From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 5 11:54:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6241E16A4CE; Wed, 5 May 2004 11:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blake.polstra.com (blake.polstra.com [64.81.189.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BF143D41; Wed, 5 May 2004 11:54:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from strings.polstra.com (dsl081-189-067.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.189.67]) by blake.polstra.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i45Is4w6004655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 May 2004 11:54:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@strings.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by strings.polstra.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i45Is4Q4074607; Wed, 5 May 2004 11:54:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.5 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4098D091.5020507@DeepCore.dk> Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.088833, version=0.14.5 cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em(4) problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 18:54:18 -0000 On 05-May-2004 Søren Schmidt wrote: > For what its worth I have problems with one em based interface as well, > it locks the machine solid when used: > > em0: port > 0xb000-0xb01f mem 0xfb100000-0xfb11ffff irq 10 at device 1.0 on pci1 > em0: Reserved 0x20000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfb100000 > em0: Reserved 0x20 bytes for rid 0x18 type 4 at 0xb000 > em0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:80:9f:b6 > > where this one works just fine: > > em1: port > 0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xfa000000-0xfa01ffff irq 19 at device 10.0 on pci3 > em1: Reserved 0x20000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfa000000 > em1: Reserved 0x40 bytes for rid 0x18 type 4 at 0xa800 > em1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:80:9f:b7 > > > The chips are these > em0@pci1:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10758086 chip=0x10758086 rev=0x00 > hdr=0x00 > em1@pci3:10:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10768086 chip=0x10768086 rev=0x00 > hdr=0x00 Are either of the IRQs (10 and 19) shared with other devices? John