From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 16 16:32:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982A1106564A for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward3.mail.yandex.net (forward3.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:602::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F038FC08 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.mail.yandex.net (smtp3.mail.yandex.net [77.88.46.103]) by forward3.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 726D4B417E1; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:32:50 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334593970; bh=wGtUgjQw+y1eRG5+cI9rJT1soOyQJ9Dxy7KO+Rs3+lc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tTRbXwqnB5dWJRcfm7KdkGXGzz6VgbKNmW4V/LfmlqNbazFDfyb4Ocl2Yuy68QS8/ cVjMNbtiS+pX8BZNrUG4urNRvZO1cNb9ISG17SZvGOwMOpiwToEJcg4RJkaXvwZisF sAAnE5V3RbzcA3pYJqex5aozwrUJt4BdjPCIHoyY= Received: from smtp3.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4E8991BA0341; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:32:50 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp3.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id Wk4e3HX4-Wn4ipUwU; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:32:50 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334593970; bh=wGtUgjQw+y1eRG5+cI9rJT1soOyQJ9Dxy7KO+Rs3+lc=; h=Date:From:X-Mailer:Reply-To:Organization:X-Priority:Message-ID:To: CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qfnQ4C8SQnBeLAxwMRBSYvd7GCTj3drmjb0WvocB/ju+20YkKvApdzzPbW7L1uFLF 1Z+AkaIXVCAwvmMeRw3g3tcQNrQIGuXvv/csoyszRfHiGkQCE753vFPPr3UbyF1iKO vFWQaqyT8tHnMm3MBoJS4hbY/792MxQ/EHlTS5cQ= Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:32:44 +0300 From: Eugen Konkov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: ISP FreeLine X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <64897541.20120416193244@yandex.ru> To: Robert Bonomi In-Reply-To: <201204161552.q3GFqcTc023692@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <1949545469.20120416170157@yandex.ru> <201204161552.q3GFqcTc023692@mail.r-bonomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: newfs create to little inodes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugen Konkov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:32:52 -0000 >> >> Does newfs always must create sufficient count of inodes? RB> This begs the question of 'what is a sufficient count of inodes?" RB> It is well-known that the required 'inode densidy' depends on the usage RB> of the filesystem. RB> Newfs uses defaults that are 'reasonable' for 'typical' use, and are RB> rarely insuficient. 'typical' use: install system and install ports fetch sources and buildworld this cause me insuficient inodes >> Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on >> /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k 0 100% /mnt/disk1 I know 'man' and can read that. I only ask to use different values for disks with size ~5G. this change will make life easier for newbies. I only question: 'Is this change will make life easier for others'? I do not ask, why I can not do something, or help me or else. RB> *IF*, however, you know you will be creating lots of 'tiny' files on a RB> particular filesystem, it is a GOOD IDEAT(tm) to use non-default settings. >> or I must >> supply some addition options when creating FS? RB> "Read the fine manpage" applies. along with 'know your useage'. >> #df -ih >> Filesystem size used avail capacity iused ifree %iused mounted on >> /dev/ad0s1a 4.9G 2.1G 2.4G 47% 331k 0 100% /mnt/disk1 >> RB> Yup. RTFM is -definitely- indicated. >> -- С уважением, Eugen mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru