From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 15 23:58:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DC116A417 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) Received: from host.omnisec.de (host.omnisec.de [62.245.232.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB5713C46C for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) Received: from akima.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (akima.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de [172.21.1.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by host.omnisec.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8FNwJ6X025660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:58:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) From: Harald Schmalzbauer Organization: OmniSEC To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:58:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200709141103.18612.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <20070914110024.G14481@fledge.watson.org> <46EBEA18.3080800@ongs.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <46EBEA18.3080800@ongs.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709160158.15519.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> Cc: Daichi GOTO Subject: Re: Unionfs patchset p19 commit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:58:22 -0000 Am Samstag, 15. September 2007 16:20:08 schrieb Daichi GOTO: > Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > >> the first thing I have to do after a csup is to apply the unionfs > >> patchset-19-20070504. Is there any chance to get it commited before > >> RELENG_7? It fixes at least one nasty bug for me and I haven't had any > >> problems with unionfs so far (although constantly, but not heavily > >> used). > > > > RE has handed this off to Jeff Roberson for some review, and I think I > > saw that last week he sent out some questions to Goto-san. As I saw > > Goto-san at the front of the room in the first session at EuroBSDCon > > this morning, he may be delayed in responding a bit longer. :-) > > I have sent a answer mail to jeff already, now waiting for > his response :) perhaps he is busy. > > I have a big hope to get merged into FreeBSD until > 7-RELEASE. Progress is step by step slowly, but going > forward absolutely. If you have interest in unionfs > improvements, push your passion to re@ and fs@ committers ;-) First I think I should thank the active developers :) Thank you! I'd love to see it in RELENG_7 but if it can't be accomplished I'm still glad that there's this nice patch. It's all I need and I don't have the skills to help out, so I'll better keep calm... Kind regards, -Harry