From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 7 20:00:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FECB16A4D3; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 20:00:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6A843D73; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 20:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a043.otenet.gr [212.205.215.43]) i87K0T00014831; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 23:00:31 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i87Jwcvi006366; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:58:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i87JwchH006365; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:58:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:58:38 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Message-ID: <20040907195838.GC5958@gothmog.gr> References: <1094426835.767.50.camel@localhost> <20040907.132716.71088896.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040907223907.66e707b5@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040907223907.66e707b5@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Phone: +30-2610-312145 Mobile: +30-6944-116520 cc: bmah@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: 5.3 Migration Guide X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 20:00:55 -0000 On 2004-09-07 22:39, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Item #8: > > o you *MUST* do a fsck -p before mount -uw / (note: I always > > -uw rather than -u). > > why ? I remember a post of Kirk McKusick forwarded by someone to one of the lists that mentioned why this is necessary. Some of the filesystem metadata and/or superblock information is kept in different places now. The mount won't fail if you try it without having run fsck before, but disk usage reporting tools like du and df will print wrong information until you *do* run the fsck.