From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Nov 27 02:11:07 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA901152040 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 02:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from admin.sibptus.ru (admin.sibptus.ru [IPv6:2001:19f0:5001:21dc::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDDBC7A611 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 02:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sibptus.ru; s=20181118; h=In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=qVVjcfLJPzaccczuurmYnDBm5bNaqjCJMBiJRC3mNaQ=; b=LQmO372spBoWfx2sGAzpkOgLcX koClfT101AXtu0oMn+aJRFxYJM1s1DuHs3AkoQxLXZ/qU1tIuj8EKr53vfqzCjygd1S5bDr8+Xtvf BXKZmBiqZ9ABASTp51XOHKB3ifq6vo+Bl2PuYoEaJLHThbv8JFPOUfAsFC9jIncoYKxo=; Received: from vas by admin.sibptus.ru with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1gRSq9-000Lix-N2; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:11:05 +0700 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:11:05 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: RW Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Invalid DKIM signatures in this list Message-ID: <20181127021105.GC79319@admin.sibptus.ru> References: <20181126125259.GB86999@admin.sibptus.ru> <20181126165916.6c6bf874@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20181126165916.6c6bf874@gumby.homeunix.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: Victor Sudakov X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EDDBC7A611 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.06 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.930,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[sibptus.ru]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.959,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tomsk.su]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.27)[0.270,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[sibptus.ru:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: admin.sibptus.ru]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[googlemail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.07)[asn: 20473(0.45), country: US(-0.09)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:5000::/38, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 02:11:07 -0000 RW via freebsd-questions wrote: >On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:10:27 +0100 (CET) >Trond Endrestøl wrote: > >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:52+0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: >> >> > Dear Colleagues, >> > >> > I have noticed that the Mailman which manages this list keeps the >> > sender's "DKIM-Signature:" header intact but modifies the body of >> > the message by adding a footer. >> >> Are you sure? >> >> When I received your message, the hash was made up using Message-ID, >> Subject, To, From, Date, and In-Reply-To. I failed to find the latter >> field. > >That's legitimate, it signs the absence of that header if it's not >present at the time of signing. Oh no, I'm talking about the hash of the *body* of the message. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/