From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 13:49:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A6016A418 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dian@spin.net.id) Received: from smtp-r.spin.net.id (smtp.spin.net.id [203.134.232.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072C813C458 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dian@spin.net.id) Received: from localhost (localhost.spin.net.id [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-r.spin.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3624E84474 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:57:01 +0700 (WIT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at spin.net.id Received: from smtp-r.spin.net.id ([203.134.232.10]) by localhost (smtp-r.spin.net.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aA6mMzWrsgYB for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:56:55 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [203.134.235.133] (unknown [203.134.235.133]) by smtp-r.spin.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406C58444E for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:56:55 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <46C063DD.50008@spin.net.id> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:59:57 +0700 From: Dian Candra User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org References: <46BFD392.2020804@spin.net.id> <20070813043049.GA32692@verio.net> <46C0562A.8060201@rxsec.com> In-Reply-To: <46C0562A.8060201@rxsec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Using PF + ALTQ in FreeBSD 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dian@spin.net.id List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:49:54 -0000 Yes, it's work with Dummynet well, cause I'm using dummynet for some years. The problem is, with dummynet I could not do "borrow" bandwidth from the parent. So, I should move to ALTQ+PF, but unfortunately I'm facing a problem with it. Please give me some comment, If I use ALTQ+PF in my router, it's really could not limit incoming and outgoing traffic from/to my client ? Does no one have a bettter experience ? regards, Dian Chris Marlatt wrote: > David DeSimone wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I'm curious what you think your router can do to prevent hosts on the >> internet from sending traffic too fast. >> >> Once you have received the packets, it is too late to limit their >> arrival rate. >> > > Can't ipfw do this through dummynet? It seems to work fine for me in my > tests. > > Now yes it's not really preventing them from sending traffic, but it > should still be able to queue it and invoke latency to simulate a slower > link/pipe. > > Regards, > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >