From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 23 21:41:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B66EA38; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1887926E0; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6NLfRcU022940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:41:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uqs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:41:27 +0200 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Subject: Re: Please review patch for aic7xxx_pci.c Message-ID: <20130723214126.GG9030@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20130716094927.GA9030@acme.spoerlein.net> <20130723071129.GD9030@acme.spoerlein.net> <20130723204530.GE9030@acme.spoerlein.net> <86E509ED-694D-49B0-A3D9-C9C7B71F67CE@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <86E509ED-694D-49B0-A3D9-C9C7B71F67CE@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: scsi@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:41:29 -0000 On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:15:53 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > On Jul 23, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > > Thanks, but maybe it's better to have the discussion here. > > > > You wrote: > > The difference in the argument order between the declaration and definition is > > likely what led to this programming error. Your patch should also correct the > > argument reversal in the declaration of ahc_9005_subdevinfo_valid(). > > > > The argument order you've used seems the best choice since it matches what is > > used in ahc_compose_id(). > > > > > > > > I'm not sure that reversing the arguments in the function definition is > > the right way. This would make the patch a no-op. > > Read the quote again. I said change the "declaration", not the > "definition". To be extremely clear, the code currently looks like > this: D'oh, that's what I get for reading too fast. I've opted to change the function definition, in the end, so that declaration, definition and call-site are in sync, see https://github.com/uqs/freebsd-head/commit/e699b2fde01f235a22e1125e9f3aef16623b512f Thanks! Uli