From owner-freebsd-atm  Wed May 12 14:16:16 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org
Received: from plains.NoDak.edu (plains.NoDak.edu [134.129.111.64])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85DF15304
	for <freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 May 1999 14:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu)
Received: (from tinguely@localhost)
	by plains.NoDak.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA11523;
	Wed, 12 May 1999 16:16:13 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 16:16:13 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu>
Message-Id: <199905122116.QAA11523@plains.NoDak.edu>
To: mks@networkcs.com, toto@ixtoto.ifsc.sc.usp.br
Subject: Re: your mail
Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

yet another thought:

I used VBR with n=1 and m=1. I could not see what the Efficient or Fore cards
were using for a outgoing data rate. could the switch be dropping the PDU as
a non-conforming rate?


--mark tinguely.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message