From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 16 16:03:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C362DDBB for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dfr@rabson.org) Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406F2E5 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id er20so4279994lab.4 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:03:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=2bS5WAq9qxPvmXGVgznwkPWgF8nXznzpmnMNJlJrLvo=; b=ITx4/AMwwXMTl+7L6C0z4pPgVVSUsKtOOmBUbjitt5PMy7Ne0/IAP/QrQe4HRa9pRi 7cG4F+KiBLY7URElBr0Jqq4rYQ51jI/FGJ4ZzoSiS9zWA0bnw9Y2bNw6qWELyeiT4TO5 VriAK12I92JcDaJjoZG7W6UQIhLX4duMc+TkCUVfwXO+VBfw2JSPzg+TiupjltnSxyOu 9iqZv+XqmOvKyvLiRaGI2SWky3RKKQpurPrqwvu+qt2UNUiPQGVEHZSLwRyCkphtl36h hBQjBuExCT5whJflpE55yYUlLEVmr6NcdjdMMwSwv7MeNiPsKOvAd6DBowBvL+tOTT5w aePA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.46.70 with SMTP id t6mr3523150lbm.107.1361030599163; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:03:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.58.225 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:03:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <336731055.3000548.1360798935813.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:03:19 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security? From: Doug Rabson To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elias_M=E5rtenson?= X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzHrjbcjsQUERbhk8nDDNO0b5/B3HqyS4Y5JB4qQq4aBTj0W1I0Qg55CsBBGL61FOClURD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Rick Macklem , Benjamin Kaduk , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:03:20 -0000 On 16 February 2013 13:57, Elias M=E5rtenson wrote: > On 16 February 2013 18:58, Doug Rabson wrote: > >> This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in the >> local password database? >> >> If you are using heimdal from the base distribution and you have source, >> you should be able to build them with debug information which may help. >> When I was writing gssd, I mostly ran it under gdb to debug problems lik= e >> this. To build something in the base with debug information, go to the >> directory in the source tree for that component and type something like >> 'make DEBUG_FLAGS=3D-g clean all install'. >> > > No worries. I do have that user (and everything else, specifically single > sign-on ssh) works with it. I do agree that if I had not that user, the > behaviour I see would be neatly explained. > > When it comes to gssd, I've got its behaviour pretty well nailed down. It > does what it's supposed to do. > > However, when I tried rebuilding libgssapi.so.10, I ended up with gssd > hanging when it used the new library. I have no idea why. > > Would it be wise to upgrade from 9.1-RELEASE to something newer? I've see= n > references to 10-CURRENT. I'd like to be debugging the latest version of > everything, but this machine also needs to serve as a fileserver for my > home office, so some degree of stability is needed. > > I don't think much (if anything) has changed with gssd between 9.1 and current. When your gssd hangs, you can try to get a stack trace using gdb's attach command. > Regards, > Elias >