From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 17 07:36:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F60B16A40F for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D252F13C441 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1756744uge for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:36:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=RRZm3+fprpW46mRlYTb7cCWHFzklAYG80RboToRMn/aDpnLTI52NLdtQgqKdZCW94wB5x0l0LiY10mlf5SexTzoxCPYiuuW+a7NPsW1YBTuxsjcz7UyEHuswFOd+Kgh9YLn0fWI7z7tJp3lOTHXYN93cxyHU3g7PBPhk+MJpmV8= Received: by 10.67.117.18 with SMTP id u18mr9016414ugm.1169019365370; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:36:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.255.10 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:36:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0701162336o142cb60od8a092b4bcca589c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:36:05 +0300 From: "Abdullah Al-Marrie" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 + CPUTYPE?=nocona broke my kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:36:07 -0000 Hello, I recompiled my kernel with make.conf has CPUTYPE?=nocona with the latest src via cvsup. But that broke my kernel while I have Dual xeon EMT64. So I think it's not safe to use nocona or prescott with kernel, and I should stick to cpu i686 instead. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/