From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Nov 16 2: 4: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from lists01.iafrica.com (lists01.iafrica.com [196.7.0.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFAD37B4C5; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 02:04:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwl.fw.uunet.co.za ([196.31.2.162]) by lists01.iafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2) id 13wLtV-00073S-00; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:03:49 +0200 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by nwl.fw.uunet.co.za (8.8.8/8.6.9) id MAA23995; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:03:57 +0200 (SAST) Received: by nwl.fw.uunet.co.za via recvmail id 23902; Thu Nov 16 12:03:36 2000 Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.fw.uunet.co.za) by axl.fw.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13wLtI-0000bo-00; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:03:36 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Terry Lambert Cc: jhb@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Turning on debugging in GENERIC In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:58:17 GMT." <200011160958.CAA02498@usr02.primenet.com> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:03:36 +0200 Message-ID: <2343.974369016@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:58:17 GMT, Terry Lambert wrote: > I still think that increasing kernel spew to the DIAGNOSTIC level, > at a cost of potentially very different code paths, is much less > useful [...] I haven't noticed any interesting disagreement on that score. Unless someone has new issues to bring to light, it looks like we have agreement on this one. Go, John, go! :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message