From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 20:38:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2610D16A4CE for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:38:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (glewis.dsl.xmission.com [166.70.56.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335CF43D54 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:38:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) i9EKbxs7007350; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:38:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9EKbxKF007349; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:37:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:37:59 -0600 From: Greg Lewis To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20041014203759.GA7268@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20041012170114.GA70274@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041012170114.GA70274@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: java_cup-10.k failed on i386 4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:38:02 -0000 On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:01:14AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Any ideas why every port that uses diablo is failing on 4.x? Works for me on 4.10. It almost seems like the .java_wrapper script is failing to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH correctly or that path doesn't contain libjava.so (I'm not sure how this could occur) or libjava.so can't be loaded for some reason. Since diablo hasn't been changed recently, one would assume its some recent change in 4.x? Doesn't bento use some sort of 4.x jail on a 5.x box to do its port builds? -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org