From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Apr 29  9:17: 8 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from windoze.tenebras.com (windoze.tenebras.com [216.15.43.196])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E986F37B58D
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 09:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kudzu@dnai.com)
Received: from dnai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by windoze.tenebras.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00821;
	Sat, 29 Apr 2000 09:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kudzu@dnai.com)
Message-ID: <390B0B02.47368F2A@dnai.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 09:17:06 -0700
From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@dnai.com>
Reply-To: kudzu@tenebras.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Numerous broken ports
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


It seems to me that you shouldn't be including
ports in the 4.0 tree unless you've at least 
verified that they compile, or maybe even run.

I have now run into a dozen that don't even build.

WTF aren't you even checking this shit?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message