From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 27 14:18:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AF216A562 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5704744578 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:56:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0787291AFD; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:56:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81134-03; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1046) id 45B90291AFE; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:56:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB32291AFD; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:56:21 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:56:21 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: freebsd@hub.org To: Nikolas Britton In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060827105436.P82634@hub.org> References: <20060826223927.I82634@hub.org> <20060827020210.GA9218@zloy.stilyagin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Darrin Chandler , Atom Powers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDstats: Just added - Vendor Stats X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:18:59 -0000 On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 8/26/06, Atom Powers wrote: >> On 8/26/06, Darrin Chandler wrote: >> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:43:38PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> > > >> > > Neat to see nVidia *much* more popular then ATI though ... >> > >> > Really? Why is that neat? nVidia restricts your choices through their >> > staunch refusal to provide open specs. They are not nice players in this >> > game. At least there's some hope about ATI after the AMD deal. >> > >> >> Probably because the /good/ AMD boards use an nVidia chipsets. ( eg, the >> K8N) >> > > What I think is interesting is the only ~50% uptake of FreeBSD/amd64 > on 64-bit x86 capable systems. FreeBSD/i386 takes ~90% of the pie. > Also the less then 1% uptake of sparc64 and alpha ports and 0% for > FreeBSD/PPC. Maybe we should can some of these platform ports, how > much overhead do they add to the project? Well, considering we are only seeing ~2 weeks of stats, I think its a bit early to 'can ports' :) But, as far as 'overhead do they add', my guess is next to zero ... those working on those ports are most likely those more familiar with PPC/Sparc then they are with Intel stuff, so, in essence, we've attract those developers to us vs converted existing developers over to those platforms for porting purposes ...