From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 24 20:14:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BB27826 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 20:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077FE29E3 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 20:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1WoIKf-0008um-Dg; Sat, 24 May 2014 22:14:17 +0200 Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 22:14:17 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion Message-ID: <20140524201417.GK2341@home.opsec.eu> References: <2318877.ATaMhzlr5B@desktop.reztek> <1521997.Va510XRLDQ@desktop.reztek> <534AD94A.2030105@marino.st> <2827292.qM76QHi0yk@workstation.reztek> <20140524180557.GF2341@home.opsec.eu> <5380F792.2040301@sorbs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5380F792.2040301@sorbs.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:14:17 -0000 Hi! > They just need converting to a staged environment? If so if you'd like > to take a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=189880 and > tell me if I did it right and tell me how I can choose something that > no-one is working on I'll crack on with some of them. I test-build the stuff you submitted and it looks fine. What's the reason there are so many different pgpool-II ports ? Can they be consolidated ? > > Provide PRs, send me a Cc: and I can have a look at them. > I'm happy to help when I have time (today I could have probably got > through 10 'easy' ones).. however having never done it before and no > actual feedback of what I have done as I have now updated 2 (one new > one, one add a patch to an existing one) .. I don't know if I'd even get > it right... that said my poudriere VMs and jenkins are not complaining > about what I have done (I patch auto-manually (scripted) after each > portsnap) I think the pgpool one is fine! Have you've been in contact with the maintainer for pgpool-II, kuriyama@ ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !