From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 12:49:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC1F16A41F; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225C313C45A; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5GCnmgu044574; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:49:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Hartmut Brandt Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:47:04 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200705210249.l4L2n8KS097032@repoman.freebsd.org> <200706151630.20867.jhb@freebsd.org> <467313B1.7070507@dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <467313B1.7070507@dlr.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706160847.05499.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:49:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/3437/Sat Jun 16 06:22:22 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Daniel Eischen , cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib Makefile.inc src/lib/libatm Makefile src/lib/libautofs Makefile src/lib/libbegemot Makefile src/lib/libbluetooth Makefile src/lib/libbsm Makefile src/lib/libbz2 Makefile src/lib/libc_r Makefile src/lib/libcrypt ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:49:55 -0000 On Friday 15 June 2007 06:33:21 pm Hartmut Brandt wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Sunday 20 May 2007 10:49:08 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: > >> deischen 2007-05-21 02:49:08 UTC > >> > >> FreeBSD src repository > >> > >> Modified files: > >> lib/libautofs Makefile > > > > This isn't connected to the build AFAICT. > > > >> Log: > >> Bump library versions in preparation for 7.0. > >> > >> Ok'd by: kan > > > > Was this bump supposed to be exhaustive? The following libraries haven't been > > bumped relative to 6.x: > > > > - libalias > > - libbsnmp > > - all the snmp_*.so modules > > I'm probably not up-to-date with the handling of version numbers, but I > would think that the snmp_*.so modules version numbers are meant to > reflect the API version that these modules use (which is implemented by > bsnmpd). This hasn't changed, so what would be the reason to bump that > number? Same for libbsnmp. If they depend on libc.so then they could try to pull libc.so.6 into an existing binary using libc.so.7 (or vice versa). Probably for snmp_* and bsnmpd this doesn't matter since folks are likely to use the bsnmpd that comes with the OS. But we bumped all of this for 6.0, which is why I'm asking if the bump was supposed to be exhaustive like 6.0, or if it was intentionally only bumping a subset. The fact that most of the ncurses libraries were bumped but not the two 'libncurses*' suggests that at least that case is a bug. > harti > > > - libdialog.so.5 > > - libgnuregex.so.3 > > - libhistory.so.6 > > - liblwres.so.10 > > - libncurses.so.6 > > - libncursesw.so.6 > > - rest of ncurses was bumped > > - libpam.so.3 > > - all the pam_*.so modules > > - libreadline.so.6 > > - libssh.so.3 > > > > -- John Baldwin