From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 00:45:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713CF106564A for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from editor@d3photography.com) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BA28FC12 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA05D264BF13; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:46:17 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ScIuCi2TlKVd; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:46:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.0.1.198] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4F31264BF12; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:46:04 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <4d97ba5a.199K2FcyLXA6+b5f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:45:06 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <9BFF22F1-7559-4107-B149-94A79CA3ADB7@d3photography.com> References: <4D96668C.3090406@telting.org> <4d97ba5a.199K2FcyLXA6+b5f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: christopher-ml@telting.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: Port dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 00:45:20 -0000 On Apr 2, 2011, at 7:07 PM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Chris Rees wrote: >> On 2 April 2011 00:58, Chris Telting wrote: >>> One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell. >> >> I think you've misunderstood the term dependency hell [1]. Anyone >> who has spent hours struggling with rpm ... would never dare to >> even think of such terms when using the Ports Collection. > > Dependency purgatory? Dantency Inferno. :)