From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 24 21:33:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C541FD52 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 21:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6A02011 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 21:33:41 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0N630031KLDHJX00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 14:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <53811033.7080502@sorbs.net> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 23:33:39 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion References: <2318877.ATaMhzlr5B@desktop.reztek> <1521997.Va510XRLDQ@desktop.reztek> <534AD94A.2030105@marino.st> <2827292.qM76QHi0yk@workstation.reztek> <20140524180557.GF2341@home.opsec.eu> <5380F792.2040301@sorbs.net> <20140524201417.GK2341@home.opsec.eu> In-reply-to: <20140524201417.GK2341@home.opsec.eu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 21:33:42 -0000 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > >> They just need converting to a staged environment? If so if you'd like >> to take a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=189880 and >> tell me if I did it right and tell me how I can choose something that >> no-one is working on I'll crack on with some of them. >> > > I test-build the stuff you submitted and it looks fine. > Good I'm on the right track then.. that's the important thing - knew it built - but wasn't sure if it was 'correct' for staging etc.. (no build errors != right, just that it might be ok ;-) ) > What's the reason there are so many different pgpool-II ports ? > Can they be consolidated ? > Don't know - I can understand 2.x and 3.x and a 3.x-devel - but no idea why so many otherwise. > >>> Provide PRs, send me a Cc: and I can have a look at them. >>> > > >> I'm happy to help when I have time (today I could have probably got >> through 10 'easy' ones).. however having never done it before and no >> actual feedback of what I have done as I have now updated 2 (one new >> one, one add a patch to an existing one) .. I don't know if I'd even get >> it right... that said my poudriere VMs and jenkins are not complaining >> about what I have done (I patch auto-manually (scripted) after each >> portsnap) >> > > I think the pgpool one is fine! Have you've been in contact > with the maintainer for pgpool-II, kuriyama@ ? > No response so far - coming up on 2 weeks (bit more for 'official contact' I think.) Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/