From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 23:11:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB1316A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:11:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx3.bol-online.com (mx3.bol-online.com [202.84.36.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A440343D31 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:11:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahan@bol-online.com) Received: from netra.bol-online.com (netra.bol-online.com [202.84.32.21]) by mx3.bol-online.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887F650879 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:12:48 +0600 (BDT) Received: from [192.168.168.89] (ppp209.bol-online.com [202.84.34.219]) by netra.bol-online.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1MN6GU7009405 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:06:17 +0600 (BDT) Message-ID: <421C62F7.4060402@bol-online.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:03:19 -0600 From: Aftab Jahan Subedar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <421C5EB4.9050906@bol-online.com> <20050222230228.GF253@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20050222230228.GF253@dan.emsphone.com> X-BOL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BOL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahan@bol-online.com X-MailScanner-To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: SCO file system mounting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:11:41 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: >In the last episode (Feb 23), Aftab Jahan Subedar said: > > >>Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know ? I >>presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or >>partition type 0x63. >> >> > >Sorry; no-one has written drivers for any of SCO's filesystem types >(htfs is probably what you have). > > > Legal issue? If not I will try one.