From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 18:45:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9234C16A4B3 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pit.databus.com (p70-227.acedsl.com [66.114.70.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF5244008 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:45:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: from pit.databus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pit.databus.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h941jRcw033322 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 21:45:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by pit.databus.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id h941jR5R033321 for current@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 21:45:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 21:45:27 -0400 From: Barney Wolff To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031004014527.GB32411@pit.databus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 Subject: [security-advisories@freebsd.org: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:17.procfs] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 01:45:29 -0000 I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain the equivalent revs for -head? Surely I can't be the only person following -current who doesn't build every day. This notable omission has been true of every security advisory I can remember, and I've never understood it. If I'm missing some logic that makes it the right thing to do, can somebody please enlighten me? Thanks, Barney ----- Forwarded message from FreeBSD Security Advisories ----- VI. Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/sys/i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_misc.c 1.3.2.9 src/sys/kern/kern_subr.c 1.31.2.3 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_dbregs.c 1.4.2.4 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_fpregs.c 1.11.2.4 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_regs.c 1.10.2.4 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_rlimit.c 1.5.2.1 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_status.c 1.20.2.5 src/sys/sys/uio.h 1.11.2.2 RELENG_5_1 src/UPDATING 1.251.2.11 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.50.2.11 src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_dbregs.c 1.22.2.1 src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_fpregs.c 1.28.2.1 src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_regs.c 1.27.2.1 src/sys/fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c 1.35.2.1 src/sys/kern/kern_subr.c 1.74.2.1 src/sys/sys/uio.h 1.27.2.1 etc. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.