From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 16 16:23:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81CE53C for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokedhs@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (mail-lb0-f180.google.com [209.85.217.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252B41AF for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q12so3338152lbc.11 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:23:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iqxh7jO6D0gP4NCcIi+OYxxETgT7He7yz5SrZ8ZN94Y=; b=yo3ZvrOOHKNieV8Kqlgez7kahSZlbtpXN9zpJyqgAQKjW0+dvo25W7frESulnoORrt 5cuo3X91n0d2whTsSY0xM9CCuockrpn8fxWmqizVwA88mJ45/9zQwXRurPuiy0oBU6S8 iMvFOjdGL3yNIXHfeuQDKYJlN+fghiuF7CCdIPyw1xpWtNW/CyfqL2LWcp6kUvxR/gOq 2tpsMkXex6zbF/AvTDNT9vUIZHi/WvIfQ/XMf3ZhdSYfMH5BzAbETcmesuNAauNul/hp FzqqP80kaGbTf+8wPGecV01ZXyTVA8ThyXEje/W7ufXFLPYI3GYe03kZG2KOFWIs/JZs 4cOg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.25.8 with SMTP id y8mr3508867lbf.81.1361031519336; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:18:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.41.68 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:18:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <336731055.3000548.1360798935813.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:18:39 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elias_M=E5rtenson?= To: Doug Rabson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Rick Macklem , Benjamin Kaduk , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:23:59 -0000 On 17 February 2013 00:03, Doug Rabson wrote: > I don't think much (if anything) has changed with gssd between 9.1 and > current. When your gssd hangs, you can try to get a stack trace using gdb's > attach command. > > Fair enough. However, when it hangs, I have at least a 50% chance of hitting the gssd-realted kerberl panic. Should I apply the patch you gave me, or would you suggest an upgrade?